Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by the progressive loss of upper (UMN) and lower motor neurons (LMN) in four different body regions (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral). Over the past decades, several clinical scoring systems have been developed to assess the UMN and LMN burden in ALS. However, concerning the bulbar LMN burden, the available scoring systems solely assess the presence/absence of bulbar LMN signs without providing a degree of impairment. Therefore, in this study, we proposed a novel scale to stratify subjects with ALS according to the bulbar LMN involvement and assessed its prognostic value. Methods: We developed a four-item scale based on the LMN signs according to the El Escorial criteria. Ten raters, specializing in ALS or neurocognitive disorders, retrospectively applied the scale to the first evaluation of 195 patients with ALS. Cohen's kappa (Cohen's k) and an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the inter-rater reliability. The Kaplan-Mayer estimator was used to estimate survival distribution according to the bulbar scale scores. Results: The raters showed a substantial to excellent agreement with Cohen's k, ranging from 0.834 to 0.975, with an overall ICC of 0.922 (95% CI = 0.906-0.936). The survival distribution was statistically different across the three bulbar scale scores (χ2(2) = 9.50, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our bulbar LMN scale represents a reliable measure of the bulbar LMN signs in ALS. This easy-to-administer clinical scale could provide unique information in phenotyping and predicting survival in ALS.

A Clinical Scale for Rating the Severity of Bulbar Lower Motor Neuron Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Filardi, Marco;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by the progressive loss of upper (UMN) and lower motor neurons (LMN) in four different body regions (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral). Over the past decades, several clinical scoring systems have been developed to assess the UMN and LMN burden in ALS. However, concerning the bulbar LMN burden, the available scoring systems solely assess the presence/absence of bulbar LMN signs without providing a degree of impairment. Therefore, in this study, we proposed a novel scale to stratify subjects with ALS according to the bulbar LMN involvement and assessed its prognostic value. Methods: We developed a four-item scale based on the LMN signs according to the El Escorial criteria. Ten raters, specializing in ALS or neurocognitive disorders, retrospectively applied the scale to the first evaluation of 195 patients with ALS. Cohen's kappa (Cohen's k) and an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the inter-rater reliability. The Kaplan-Mayer estimator was used to estimate survival distribution according to the bulbar scale scores. Results: The raters showed a substantial to excellent agreement with Cohen's k, ranging from 0.834 to 0.975, with an overall ICC of 0.922 (95% CI = 0.906-0.936). The survival distribution was statistically different across the three bulbar scale scores (χ2(2) = 9.50, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our bulbar LMN scale represents a reliable measure of the bulbar LMN signs in ALS. This easy-to-administer clinical scale could provide unique information in phenotyping and predicting survival in ALS.
2023
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, bulbar region, lower motor neuron, survival
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A Clinical Scale for Rating the Severity of Bulbar Lower Motor Neuron Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 484.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
484.66 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12071/43817
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact