A number of recent judgments, rendered by the European Court of Human Rights as the EU Court of Justice, concern the question of compatibility between the obligations under the European Con- vention on Human Rights and the EU Dublin System. The Dublin procedure requires EU Member States (and other cooperating non-EU Member States) to determine, based on a hierarchy of objec- tive criteria, which State is responsible for examining an application for international protection, lodged on their territory. In this perspective, both Courts have increasingly applied the so-called ‘sovereignty clause’, included in the Dublin mechanism. This provision enables any Member State to examine a claim for international submitted in its territory, even if it is not responsible according to the Regulation criteria. Despite the apparent connections between the view taken by the Euro- pean Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice, the analysis of the relevant case law reveals a certain diversity of perspective in identifying ways to ensure coordination between the two systems involved.

Sistema di Dublino e tutela dei diritti fondamentali: il rilievo della clausola di sovranità nella giurisprudenza più recente

Marchegiani M
2014-01-01

Abstract

A number of recent judgments, rendered by the European Court of Human Rights as the EU Court of Justice, concern the question of compatibility between the obligations under the European Con- vention on Human Rights and the EU Dublin System. The Dublin procedure requires EU Member States (and other cooperating non-EU Member States) to determine, based on a hierarchy of objec- tive criteria, which State is responsible for examining an application for international protection, lodged on their territory. In this perspective, both Courts have increasingly applied the so-called ‘sovereignty clause’, included in the Dublin mechanism. This provision enables any Member State to examine a claim for international submitted in its territory, even if it is not responsible according to the Regulation criteria. Despite the apparent connections between the view taken by the Euro- pean Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice, the analysis of the relevant case law reveals a certain diversity of perspective in identifying ways to ensure coordination between the two systems involved.
2014
international protection; EU Court of Justice; EU Dublin system; sovereignty clause; Eu- ropean Court of Human Rights; human rights.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
8 Sistema di Dublino e tutela dei diritti fondamentali il rilievo della clausola di sovranità nella giurisprudenza più recente.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso chiuso
Dimensione 271.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
271.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12071/1251
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact