The Presidential Form of Government in Argentina and Chile

In this contribution the approach of investigation will, therefore, be the comparative constitutional law one, taking into consideration the various normative profiles related to the relationship between the constitutional organs that define in an overall sense the form of government of the systems under analysis. The choice has, then, fallen on the comparison between two countries of the extreme Cono Sur (Argentina and Chile) bordering each other, which, at the end of the long and complex authoritarian season, have adopted their own constitutions without, however, proceeding to the election of a Constituent Assembly and whose respective presidential forms of government show various traits of differentiation (at least) at the constitutional level, so that within this framework, the study of the form of government makes it possible to highlight the differences between the various systems and to make the resulting sub-classifications